Now 15 years
old, Nana Coupeau, Gervaise and Coupeau’s daughter, first appeared in L’Assommoir
as a child. Brought up on the street, Nana started her career as a tart, or
courtesan, or whatever you might call for prostitutes. However that day, three years
before Franco-Prussian War, Nana would began her new step as an actress in the Théâtre
des Variétés. Her debut has created a big fuss all over Paris, although—as the
manager stated—she had neither good voice nor good acting. The opera
was very successful, and Nana suddenly became a famous tart in Paris. Many
gentlemen fell for her; there was a count who came from very conservative
family; another was a girlish young man; while the others ranged from Jewish
banker to rich hedonist young men of all Paris. They were all bent under Nana’s
sexual charm; risking everything—money, family, honor—to be with her. In three
years Nana has been ruining these men’s lives, but the one who suffered most
was Count Muffat.
In Nana,
Zola criticized the moral corruption which infected France in the Second
Empire. Actually, reading Nana right after The Kill was quite
intriguing, because I felt a close similarity in both novels—the moral lose in
the shape of excessive sexual and pleasure appetites. In Nana herself, we saw that
her alcoholic parents and the slump environment affected her sexual behavior
and gave her insatiable passion for pleasure.
We also
learned from Nana how difficult for
people who lived in the gutter of Paris to avoid their return to the same gutter,
no matter what they do. In fact, Nana was once one of the richest tarts in
Paris, while rich and influential men provided any luxury she asked for.
However, no matter how much she possessed, she would spend much more. And
although she longed to be regarded as a lady, she still could not resist of
taking men from street to sleep with her, from time to time.
It is also
interesting to see how women in the second half of 19th century
struggled to have more influence in the midst of patriarchal world. At that era, women didn't have access to both education and career, but they learned that they had another power which only women had: sexual charm, and it was so powerful that they could overpower the men and rule the country or society. Here the moral
loose was not only in the lower level of society (the workers), but also in the
aristocracy, both courtesans and respectable ladies gripped their claws in the
men’s lives and ruin them.
There were a
lot of other examples in Nana, that it is so difficult to break the habitual
chain we inherited from our families and environment. Zola often made his
characters to be helpless victims, as if they had neither any will power nor
hope to change themselves. As if, we, human being, are merely product of
nature, and our future always depends on evolution process. I have read seven
books from Zola, and in most of them, I always thought, why they (the central
characters) didn’t fight? Why did they surrender to their weaknesses? It is all
because Zola is a naturalist, and in this Les Rougon-Macquart series he
emphasized how hereditary weakness and corrupted society were powerful enough
to drag a person, helplessly, down to the gutter. He did not intend to preach
us on morality or religion; he just wanted to present how the corruption
happened.
Out of his
method and principle, Zola is no doubt great in story-telling, and he never
fails to amaze me. Nana won’t perhaps be one of my favorites, but the story is
entertaining and flows nicely with (as usual) a theatrical ending. Four stars
for Nana!
~~~~~~~
I read the Oxford World Classics paperback edition
This book is counted
as: